Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Fraud Detection of Financial Statements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.1051Keywords:
Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Statement FraudAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this research is to serve an overview of how corporate social responsibility (CSR), good corporate governance (GCG), and financial statement fraud detection work together to reduce fraudulent financial statements.
Theoretical framework: Cressey (1953) showed that there are three main reasons for fraud as it is known today, they are pressures faced by perpetrators, opportunities owned by perpetrators, rationalization behind the perpetrators.
Design/methodology/approach: Qualitative content analysis is the research method used in publication of scientific articles.
Findings: The attained findings reached a conclusion that financial statement fraud can be decreased by good governance, social responsibility and financial statement fraud detection. Additionally, efforts at prevention and detection must be supported by ethical values and a corporate culture that minimizes the use of false financial statements. Overall, generalizations may be made about the functions of governance, social responsibility, and fraud detection in financial statements.
Research, Practical & Social implications: Some regions are able to implement a good governance system so that it is effective in handling fraud that occurs, and some have not shown this. Research shows that the elements of governance that are tested through quantitative research still give varying results. The system for the category of good corporate governance does not always give positive results.
Originality/value: This article is a contribution to the academic literature that helps us comprehend studies on the importance of corporate social responsibility and how to identify financial statement fraud in order to decrease and steer clear of it.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, W. N., & Said, R. (2019). Audit and risk committee in financial crime prevention. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2017-0116
ACFE. (2016). Report to The Nations on occupational fraud and abuse: 2016 global fraud study. Association of Certified Fraud Examiner.
ACFE. (2020a). Survai Fraud Indonesia 2019. ACFE Indonesia.
ACFE. (2020b). Report to The Nations 2020 global study on occupational fraud and abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiner.
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., Albrecht, C. O., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2011). Fraud examination (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Andon, P., Free, C., & Scard, B. (2015). Pathways to accountant fraud: Australian evidence and analysis. Accounting Research Journal, 28(1), 10-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-06-2014-0058
Apriani, U. (2020). Pengaruh komponen-komponen fraud star terhadap korupsi dengan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) sebagai variabel moderasi. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 7(1), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jmat.v7i1.6311
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasly, M. S. (2008). Auditing dan jasa Assurance Pendekatan Teringtegrasi (12th ed.,Vol. 1). Erlangga.
Bakri, H. H., Mohamed, N., & Said, J. (2017). Mitigating asset misappropriation through integrity and fraud risk elements: Evidence emerging economies. Journal of Financial Crime, 24, 242-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2016-0024.
Brody, R. G., & Perri, F. S. (2016). Fraud detection suicide: The dark side of white-collar crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 786-797. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2015-0043.
Coyne, J. G., Summers, S. L., Williams, B., Wood, D. A. (2010). Accounting program research rankings by topical area and methodology. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 631-654. https://doi.org/10/2308/iace.2010.25.4.631.
Cressey, D. (1953). Other People’s money. In Hillison, W., et al. (Eds.), Managerial Auditing Journal, (pp. 351-362). MCB University Press.
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary accounting research, 28(1), 17-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x.
DeLiema, M., Deevy, M., Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2020). Financial fraud among older americans: Evidence and implications. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(4), 861-868. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby151
FASB. (1978). Objectives of financial reporting by business entreprises. SFAC.
Finance.detik.com. (2021, August 11). Babak baru dugaan penggelembungan laporan keuangan Taro. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-5326164/babak-baru-dugaan-penggelembungan-laporan-keuangan-produsen-taro
Forwood, P., & Bolton, P. (2018). Getting real about AI and financial crime. Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC).
Hall, M. A., & Wright, R. F. (2008). Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions. California Law Review, 96(1), 63-122.
Harahap, R. U. (2021). The Effects of Quality Control System and Auditor's Competency Implementation on Auditor's Capability in Detecting Fraud on Public Accounting Office in Medan. Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP), 4(2), 561-570. https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v4i2.1291
Harjoto, M. A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and corporate fraud. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(5), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2016-0166
Harrison, K., & Huang, L. (2020). Not all Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is created equal: A study of consumer perceptions of CSR on firms post fraud. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1828928
Hartomo, G. (2021, August 9). Kronologi kasus laporan keuangan Garuda Indonesia hingga kena sanksi. Okefinance. https://economy.okezone.com/read/2019/06/28/320/2072245/kronologi-kasus-laporan-keuangan-garuda-indonesia-hingga-kena-sanksi
Horwath, C. (2011). Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough. Crowe LLP.
Hu, H., Dou, B., & Wang, A. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility information disclosure and corporate fraud- “risk reduction” effect or “window dressing” effect? Sustainability, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041141.
Idawati, W. (2020). Analisis pendeteksian kecurangan pada laporan keuangan. Behavioral Accounting Journal, 3(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.33005/baj.v3i1.60.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2017). Standar akuntansi keuangan. Salemba Empat.
Irianto, G., Novianti, N., Rosalina, K., & Firmanto, Y. (2012). Integrity, unethical behavior, and tendency of fraud. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan), 16(2), 144-. 163. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2012.v16.i2.2320
Kontan.co.id., (2021, August 11). Mantan Direksi Tiga Pilar dituntut 7 tahun penjara. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/mantan-direksi-tiga-pilar-aisa-dituntut-7-tahun-penjara
Kurpierz, J. R., & Smith, K. (2020). The greenwashing triangle: Adapting tools from fraud to improve CSR reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(6), 1075–1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2018-0272
Law, P. (2011). Corporate governance and no fraud occurrence in organizations: Hong Kong evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(6), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111142558
Leung, P., & Cooper, B. J. (2005). Accountants, ethical issues and the corporate governance context. Australian Accounting Review, 15(35), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2005.tb00255.x
Liao, L., Guanting, C., & Dengjin, Z. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and financial fraud: Evidence from China. Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, 59(5)3133-3169. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12572
Marks, J.T. (2014). Playing offense in a high-risk environment. Crowe Howarth, 94(8), 1-14.
Maulidi, A. (2020). Storytelling of bureaucratic white-collar crimes in Indonesia: Is it a matter of reciprocal norm? Journal of Financial Crime, 27(2), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2019-0087
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., Ricceri, F., & Roberts, R. W. (2016). Behind camouflaging: Traditional and innovative theoretical perspectives in social and environmental accounting research. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954864
Muehlemann, B, W. Chiu, V. Liu Q. (2015). Emerging technologies research in accounting: Jeta’s first decade. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 12, 17-50. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51245
Mui, G., & Mailley, J. (2015). A tale of two triangles: Comparing the Fraud Triangle with criminology’s crime triangle. Accounting Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-10-2014-0092
Novita, N. (2019). Teori fraud pentagon dan deteksi kecurangan pelaporan keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 11(2), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.33508/jako.v11i2.2077
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications.
Prayoga, M. A., & Sudarmaji, E. (2019). Kecurangan laporan keuangan dalam perspektif fraud diamond theory: Studi empiris pada perusahaan sub sektor transportasi di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 21(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v21i1.503
Priantara, D. (2017, August 9). Ketika skandal fraud akuntansi menerpa British Telcom dan PwC. Warta Ekonomi. https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read145257/ketika-skandal-fraud-akuntansi-menerpa-british-telecom-dan-pwc.html
Putri, A. (2012). Kajian: Fraud (kecurangan) laporan keuangan. JRAK: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 3(1), 4473. https://doi.org/10.33558/jrak.v3i1.142
Rezaee, Z. (2002). Financial stetement fraud: Prevention and detection. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rusmana, O., & Tanjung, H. (2020). Identifikasi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan fraud pentagon studi empiris BUMN terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Akuntansi, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v21i4.1545
Siddiq, F. R., Achyani, F., & Zulfikar, Z. (2017). Fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud. http://hdl.handle.net/11617/9333
Spathis, C. T. (2002). Detecting false financial statements using published data: Some evidence from Greece. Managerial Auditing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900210424321
Stalebrink, O. J., & Sacco, J. F. (2007). Rationalization of financial statement fraud in government: An Austrian perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18(4), 489-507.
Tan, D. T., Chapple, L., & Walsh, K. D. (2017). Corporate fraud culture: Re‐examining the corporate governance and performance relation. Accounting & Finance, 57(2), 597-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12156.
Tjager, I. N., Alijono, F. A., Djemat, H. R., & Soembodo, B. (2003). Corporate governance: Tantangan dan kesempatan bagi komunitas bisnis Indonesia. PT. Prenhallindo.
Wells, J. T. (2011). Principle fraud examination (3rd ed.). Wiley and Sons Inc.
Wijaya, S. Y. (2016). Deteksi kecurangan pada pelaporan keuangan. Neo-Bis, 10(2), 138-154. https://doi.org/10.21107/nbs.v10i2.2432.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four element of fraud. CPA Journal, 74(12), 38-42.
Yeoh, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence: accelerator or panacea for financial crime? Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 634-646. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-08-2018-0077.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Wuryan Andayani, Maharani Wuryantoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html