The Impact of Information Technology Governance Under Cobit-5 Framework on Reducing the Audit Risk in Jordanian Companies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i2.1236

Keywords:

ITG, Cobit 5, Audit Risk

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study is to ascertain how the COBIT 5 framework, which consists of (Planning and organization, Acquire and implementation, Support and Delivery, Monitoring and evaluation, Guidance and Control), affects audit risk.

 

Theoretical framework: IT governance (ITG) is a strategic and administrative procedure that aids in an organization's efficient and responsible usage of IT. The efficacy of audit control and audit process can be significantly impacted by COBIT5.

 

Design/methodology/approach: This study used a quantitative approach, with questionnaires distributed to 450 workers from each of the 150 Jordanian companies. The three employees served as a representative sample from the finance, internal audit, and IT departments. A total of 371 sets of questionnaires were returned with complete responses and were further examined. The data analysis employed descriptive analysis, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regressions.

 

Findings: The results of this investigation revealed that every independent variable, including Cobit 5, had a favorable and substantial impact on the decrease of audit risk. one of the most important results of this study showed that Monitoring and evaluation is one of the most influential dimensions of ITG to reducing audit risks, and perhaps this may be due to the nature of the delivery of IT within companies’ systems and the implementation of their applications and services to be delivered.

 

Research, Practical & Social implications: This study helps Jordanian companies to enhance the application of information technology governance, which contributes to raising the level of efficiency of their accounting systems and enabling them to compete.

 

Originality/value: The findings showed that are a limited number of studies on IT governance and audit risk that have focused on developing countries, especially Jordan, and this is where the research comes in –to fill up the gap.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdel basset, A. (2014). Cobit 5 as a mechanism for IT governance a case study of state oil company, Master Thesis. Abou Bekr Belkid University. Tlemcen, Algeria.

Abdullatif, M. (2013). Fraud risk factors and audit programme modifications: Evidence from Jordan. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 7(1), 59-77.

Ahmad.o. B, (2019), the impact of the risk of planning the audit process on the quality of the audit from the viewpoint of the Jordanian chartered accountant, master thesis, alalbayt university, Jordan.

AICPA (2006): SAS Audit Sampling. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York.

Akman, V., Acar, B., & Kizil, C. (2020). Audit Techniques to Avoid Cost Accounting Frauds. Emerging Markets Journal (EMAJ), University of Pittsburgh Press (USA), 10(1), 60-66.

Al-Fatlawi, Q. A., Al Farttoosi, D. S., & Almagtome, A. H. (2021). Accounting information security and it governance under cobit 5 framework: A case study. Webology, 18(Special Issue on Information Retrieval and Web Search), 294-310.

Al-Hija, A. (2017). The impact of the reliability of accounting information systems in light of the application of information technology governance on the profitability of Jordanian banks listed on the Amman Stock Exchange, PhD thesis, The World Islamic Sciences and Education University, Jordan.

Ali, H. & Nassour, R. (2014). Determining the level of IT governance applicable Commercial Bank of Syria in Lattakia according to a framework (COBIT), Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies -Economic and Legal Sciences Series Vol. (36) No. (2).

Ali, O., Al-tahat, S., Al-Duleemi, K., Al-Afeef, J., & Al-hawamdah, H. (2019). The Impact of the Decisions of the COBIT 5 Committee on the Effectiveness of the Internal Control Systems in the Jordanian Industrial Joint Stock Companies. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(11), 1587-1599.

Alsmady , A. A. (2022). Accounting Information Quality, Tax Avoidance and Companies’ Performance: the Moderate Role of Political Connection. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(1), e0622. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i6.622

Almasria, N., Airout, R. M., Samara, A. I., Saadat, M., & Jrairah, T. S. (2021). The role of accounting information systems in enhancing the quality of external audit procedures. Journal of management Information and Decision Sciences, 24(7), 1-23.

Almusawi, I. G. (2021). USING COBIT FRAMEWORK FOR REDUCING THE AUDIT RISKS OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Akkad Journal of Contemporary Accounting Studies, 1(1), 52-74.

Alotaibi, M. Z., Alotibi, M. F., & Zraqat, O. M. (2021). The impact of information technology governance in reducing cloud accounting information systems risks in telecommunications companies in the state of Kuwait. Modern Applied Science, 15(1), 143-151.

Al Qassimi, N., & Rusu, L. (2015). IT governance in a public organization in a developing country: A case study of a governmental organization. Procardia Computer Science, 64, 450-456.

Andry, J. F., & Setiawan, A. K. (2019). IT governance evaluation using COBIT 5 framework on the national library. Journal Sistema Informasi, 15(1), 10-17.

Anomah, S., & Aduamoah, M. (2018). Proposed Analytical Procedure for The Customization and Implementation of COBIT 5, An Auditing Tool: An Action Design Research Approach. Edpacs, 57(3), 15-34.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2017). Auditing and assurance services. Auditing and Assurance Services.

ASE, (2012). Terms and conditions for using the Amman Stock Exchange website. Retrieved from https://www.ase.com.jo/.

Bakshi, S., & Eswar, M. (2018). Portfolio, Program and Project Management Using COBIT 5. http://www.isaca.org/COBIT/focus/Pages/portfolio-program-and-projectmanagement-using-cobit-5-part-3.aspx

Bryman, A. (2003). Research methods and organization studies (Vol. 20). Routledge.

Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., & Larson, C. (2011). R., and Sloan, R, G. Predicting material accounting misstatements, 17-82.

De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2015). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 123-137.

Goldman, J. E., & Ahuja, S. (2011). Integration of COBIT, balanced scorecard and SSE-CMM as an organizational & strategic information security management (ISM) framework. In ICT Ethics and security in the 21st century: new developments and applications (pp. 277-309). IGI Global.

Hamdan, A., Abzakh, M. H., & Al-Ataibi, M. H. (2010). Factors affecting accounting conservatism when preparing corporate financial reports: Evidence from Jordan. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 8(1), 23-44.

Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Validating the willingness to self-censor scale: Individual differences in the effect of the climate of opinion on opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 443-455.

Huang, R., Zmud, R. W., & Price, R. L. (2010). Influencing the effectiveness of IT governance practices through steering committees and communication policies. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3), 288-302.

Iqbal, A., Widyawan, & Mustika, I. W. (2016, June). COBIT 5 domain delivery, service and support mapping for business continuity plan. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1746, No. 1, p. 020045). AIP Publishing LLC.

Isaca, “COBIT 5: The Framework - Exposure Draft,” USA IT Gov. Inst., p. 86, 2011.

Jankūnaitė, R., Kanapickienė, R., & Gipienė, G. (2005). Employment of audit risk models. Ekonomika, 71, 59-76.

Khanom, T. (2017). Cloud Accounting: A Theoretical Overview. Journal of Business and Management, 19(6),31-38. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1906053138

Kranacher, M. J., & Riley, R. (2019). Forensic accounting and fraud examination. John Wiley & Sons.

Lee, P. J., Taylor, S. J., & Taylor, S. L. (2006). Auditor conservatism and audit quality: evidence from IPO earnings forecasts. International Journal of Auditing, 10(3), 183-199.

Lin, F., Guan, L., & Fang, W. (2010). Critical factors affecting the evaluation of information control systems with the COBIT framework: A study of CPA firms in Taiwan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 46(1), 42-55.

Mahadeen, B., Al-Dmour, R. H., Obeidat, B. Y., & Tarhini, A. (2016). Examining the effect of the Organization’s Internal Control System on Organizational Effectiveness: A Jordanian empirical study. International Journal of Business Administration, 7(6), 22-41.

Mazza, T., & Azzali, S. (2018). Information technology controls quality and audit fees: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 33(1), 123-146.

Nurhajati, Y. (2016). The Influence of Cloud Computing Technology on the Auditing Process and the Auditing Profession. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 5(8), 1-9.

Okour, S. (2019). The Impact of the Application of IT Governance According to (COBIT 5) Framework in Reduce Cloud Computing Risks. Mod. Appl. Sci, 13(7), 25.

Patón-Romero, J. D., Baldassarre, M. T., Piattini, M., & García Rodríguez de Guzmán, I. (2017). A governance and management framework for green IT. Sustainability, 9(10), 1761.

Preittigun, A., Chantatub, W., & Vatanasakdakul, S. (2012). A Comparison between IT governance research and concepts in COBIT 5. International Journal of research in management and technology, 2(6), 581-589.

Putri, M. A., Aknuranda, I., & Mahmudy, W. F. (2017). Maturity evaluation of information technology governance in PT DEF using Cobit 5 Framework. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 2(1), 19-27.

Siew, E.-G., Rosli, K., & Yeow, P. H. (2020). Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36, 100445.

Sasaki, T, Yonezawa, Y, (2010). Corporate governance and shareholder value, Journal on securities analysts, vol.3, no.

Sethibe, T., Campbell, J., & McDonald, C. (2007). IT governance in public and private sector organisations: examining the differences and defining future research directions. ACIS 2007 Proceedings, 118.

Silva, E. L. da, Lima, G. C. de A., & Veiga, C. R. P. da. (2023). Achievements and Challenges of the Regulatory Compliance Program in a Large Philanthropical Hospital Institution. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(1), e01224. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v8i1.1224

Shelest, А. S. (2021). AUDIT RISK: ESSENCE, EVALUATION AND DIRECTIONS OF MINIMIZATION. РЕДАКЦІЙНА КОЛЕГІЯ, 190

Susanti, R. Y., & Sucahyo, Y. G. (2016, May). Information technology governance evaluation and processes improvement prioritization based on COBIT 5 framework at secretariat general of the Indonesian house of representatives. In 2016 4th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Thottoli, M. M. (2021). Impact of information communication technology competency among auditing professionals. Учет. Анализ. Аудит, 8(2), 38-47.

Veerankutty, F., Ramayah, T., & Ali, N. A. (2018). Information technology governance on audit technology performance among Malaysian public sector auditors. Social Sciences, 7(8), 124.

Wolden, M., Valverde, R., & Talla, M. (2015). The effectiveness of COBIT 5 information security framework for reducing cyber attacks on supply chain management system. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 1846-1852.

Zhang, S., le Fever, H. T., & le Zhang S, F. H. (2013). An Examination of the Practicability of COBIT Framework and the Proposal of a COBIT-BSC Model. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 1(4), 391-395.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-16

How to Cite

Enas Amjed Alsaleem, & Husin, N. M. (2023). The Impact of Information Technology Governance Under Cobit-5 Framework on Reducing the Audit Risk in Jordanian Companies. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2), e01236. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i2.1236