The Need for Kaizen Culture for Manufacturing Industries in Industry 4.0




Industry 4.0, Kaizen, Continuous Improvement, Team Autonomy, SMARTKM factory (4.0)


Purpose: The study aims to find the need for creativity in industry 4.0, To test whether creativity can be embraced by Kaizen.


Theoretical framework: The problem statement is does Kaizen / Creativity to be extended to industry 4.0 and the same is researched with Literature reviews and with a set of Hypotheses.


Design/methodology/approach: Survey questions were framed to check the linkage of creativity and industry 4.0, two hypotheses was tested, 30 samples from Experts in Industry and Academia contributed to the thoughts, and Correlations and SEM were used to conclude the findings.


Findings: SPSS was used and principal component analysis with a “t” test was done to look at the correlation of independent variables to the above-mentioned hypothesis, the results revealed that there is a significant relationship with, effective communication, open innovation, Continuous Improvement, transformational leadership, collaboration, Goal clarity team autonomy, attitude, and knowledge enhancement.


Research, Practical & Social implications: The sample size is less and can need to be tested on a larger sample size. The study can also be done in employees in industry 3.0 and industry 4.0 to check the effects. The practical implications is well tested in Industry 2.0 and Industry 3.0 The same needs to be continued for industry 4.0 to induce creativity thereby knowledge enhancement and Team Autonomy. Considering human behaviour this closed loop of problems. Kaizens is needed to sustain the innovation and thereby creating a culture of involvement and ownership.


Originality/Value: There is active research in present times, researchers are showing keen interest on convincing the needs and benefits of Industry 4.0, but the behavioural aspect and its implications with industry 4.0 need to be explored. The next generation i.e. industry 4.0 will be more challenging, as there would be the challenge of a skilled workforce, and pressure for time/productivity will be high. People will be working in isolation (Sharing of thoughts and ideas will be limited Stalling of thinking approach). This may lead to psychological problems.The present study contributes to bridge this research gap.


Download data is not yet available.


Abshiek, R. Harwinder (2014) Total Productive Maintenance. Research gate.

Bahia, T. H. A., Idan, A. R., & Athab, K. R. (2023). The Effect of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in Enhancing Customer Satisfaction. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(1), e01156-e01156.

Davies, B., Diemand-Yauman, C., & van Dam, N. (2019). Competitive advantage with human dimension: From lifelong learning to lifelong employability. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 1-5.Elsepth (2000), Techniques to enhance creative thinking, Research gate

Doolen, T. L., Hacker, M. E., & Van Aken, E. M. (2003). The impact of organizational context on work team effectiveness: A study of production team. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 50(3), 285-296.

Fantana, N. L., Riedel, T., Schlick, J., Ferber, S., Hupp, J., Miles, S., ... & Svensson, S. (2022). IoT applications—value creation for industry. In Internet of Things (pp. 153-206). River Publishers

Jain, A., Bhatti, R., & Singh, H. (2014, March). Improving employee & manpower productivity by plant layout improvement. In 2014 Recent Advances in Engineering and Computational Sciences (RAECS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Maçada, A., Freitas Junior, J. C. D. S., Brinkhues, R. A., & Vasconcellos, S. D. (2022). Life Interrupted, but Performance Improved-Rethinking the Influence of Technology-Mediated Interruptions at Work and Personal Life. Maçada, ACG, Freitas Junior, JC da S.., Brinkhues, RA., & de Vasconcellos, S.(2022). Life interrupted, but performance improved: Rethinking the influence of technology-mediated interruptions at work and personal life. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(1), e0279.

P.B.Jaykumar &Goutam Das ( Feb 2019), Embracing 4.0 industry, Business today ,Proven strategies for increasing employee productivity (2019)

Reinhard, G., Jesper, V., & Stefan, S. (2016). Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise. PwC.

Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Dumitrescu, R., Krüger, A., & ten Hompel, M. (2020). Using the industrie 4.0 maturity index in industry. Current Challenges, Case Studies and Trends. Acatech COOPERATION.

Schlötzer, F. (2015). The dynamics of the digitalization and its implications for companies’ future enterpriserisk management systems and organizational structures. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.

Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 52, 161-166

Shamim, S., Cang, S., Yu, H., & Li, Y. (2016, July). Management approaches for Industry 4.0: A human resource management perspective. In 2016 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC) (pp. 5309-5316). IEEE.

Sridhar, S. (2019). Leadership Role in Making Effective use of Innovation in Industry 4.0. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8, 256-260.

Thomas brand ( 2013 ) “How Important Is Industry 4.0,for the Electronics Industry?” , industry.html,Email :[email protected]

Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M., & Gorecky, D. (2015). Towards Industry 4.0-Standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems. Ifac-Papersonline, 48(3), 579-584




How to Cite

Sridhar, S., Ponniah, V., & S, S. (2023). The Need for Kaizen Culture for Manufacturing Industries in Industry 4.0. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), e01299.