Towards Best Practices for Corporate Governance at the Air Zimbabwe for Sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.1497Keywords:
Air Zimbabwe, Corporate Governance, Sustainability, Accountability, TransparencyAbstract
Purpose: Exploring best practices for corporate governance at the Air Zimbabwe for sustainability.
Theoretical Framework: The prominence of good corporate governance remains the main thrust for potential investors worldwide. For Air Zimbabwe (a state-owned enterprise), it is essential to embrace good corporate governance to ensure the sustainability of the airline. Although the airline has adopted international principles of accountability, these are not effectively implemented rearing administrative imperfections and challenges that are prevalent in state-owned enterprises.
Methodology: This study employed a descriptive research design through desktop research predicated on critical analysis and review of current literature.
Findings: Findings show that political resolutions tend to excessively override management decisions to the detriment of the entity.
Practical and Social Implications: Yet, it is good corporate governance that should be pivotal in reconciling political interests, the public, and management.
Originality: The value of the study is to provide recommendation for improvement. It is recommended that the Air Zimbabwe oversight system be revamped and vouch for the institutionalization of a regulatory framework that enforces transparency and compliance.
Downloads
References
AFRAA, 2016. Annual Report 2016. [Online] Available at: https://afraa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Annual-Report_2016.pdf [Accessed 02 March 2022].
Balasubramanian, N., Black, B. S. & Khanna, V., 2010. The relation between firm-level corporate governance and market value: A case study of India. Emerging Markets Review, 11(4), p. 319–340.
Berle, A. & Means, G., 1932. The modern corporation and private property.. s.l.:Macmillan.
Black, B. S., Kim, W. & Jang, H., 2006. Does corporate governance affect firm value? Evidence from Korea. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 22(2), p. 366–413.
Borokhovich, K., Parrino, R. & Trapani, T., 1996. Outside directors and CEO selection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), p. 337–355.
Brown, L. & Caylor, M., 2004. Corporate governance and firm performance.. [Online] [Accessed 15 April 2022].
Byrne, J., Grover, R. & Vogel, T., 1989. Cover story: Is the boss getting paid too much?. Business Week, 46., 1 May.
Cadbury, A., 1992. 1992 report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance, s.l.: Gee Publishing.
Caramanolis-Cötelli, B., 1995. External and internal corporate control mechanisms and the role of the board of directors: A review of the literature. s.l.:Institute of Banking and Financial Management.
CGF, 2010. Corporate Governance Framework for State Enterprises and Parastatals in Zimbabwe, Harare: Ministry of State Enterprises and Parastatals.
Chiang, H. & Chia, F., 2005. An empirical study of corporate governance and corporate performance. Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(1), pp. 95-101.
Chigudu, D., 2018. Corporate governance in Africa’s public sector for sustainable development: The task ahead. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 14(1), pp. 1-10.
Chigudu, D., 2021. Picking up Pieces of Good Corporate Governance to Sustain National Railways of Zimbabwe. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, pp. 1-21.
Chiguvi, D. & Magwada, A., 2016. Crisis management in government parastatals: A case study of national railways of Zimbabwe. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(27), pp. 1-11.
Chimbari, P., 2017. Public sector corporate governance in Zimbabwe: The nexus between the ZIMCODE and state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Economics Commerce and Management, 5(7), p. 212–221.
Claessens, S., 2006. Corporate governance and development. The World Bank Research Observer, 22(1), p. 91–122.
Dahya, J., Lonie, A. & Power, D., 1998. Ownership structure, firm performance and top executive change: An analysis of UK firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 25(9-10), p. 1089–1118.
Davis, J., Schoorman, D. & Donaldson, L., 1997. The Distinctiveness of Agency Theory and Stewardship Theory.. Academy of Management Review, Volume 22, pp. 611-613.
Donaldson, L., 2005. For positive management theories while retaining science: Reply to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), p. 109–113.
Donaldson, L. & Davis, J., 1993. The need for theoratical cohorence and intellectual rigour in corporate governance research: Reply to critics of Donaldson and Davis. Australian Journal of Management, 18(2), p. 213–225.
Fama, E., 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), p. 288–307.
Fama, E. & Jensen, M., 1983. Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), p. 327–349.
Garvey, G. & Swan, P., 1994. The economics of corporate governance: Beyond the Marshallian firm. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1(2), p. 139–174.
Gilpin, D. R. & Murphy, P., 1996. Crisis Management in a Complex World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glassman, C. A., 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley and the Idea of “Good” Governance [Speech by SEC Commissioner. [Online]
Available at: http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch586.html. [Accessed 14 April 2022].
Gregg, P., Machin, S. & Szymanski, S., 1983. The disappearing relationship between directors pay and corporate performance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(1), p. 1–10.
Grossman, S. & Hart, O., 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), p. 691–719.
Hambrick, D., 2005. Just How Bad Are Our Theories? A Response to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education, Volume 4, pp. 104-107.
Hart, O., 1995. Corporate governance, some theory and applications. The Economic Journal, 105(430), p. 687–689..
Hart, O. & Moore, J., 1990. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), p. 1119–1158.
Herald, 2011. Airzim woes: Poor corporate governance to blame. [Online] Available at: https://www.herald.co.zw/airzim-woes-poor-corporate-governance-to-blame/ [Accessed 05 March 2022].
IFAC&CIPFA, 2014. International framework: Good governance in the public sector, New York: International Federation for Accountants and Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) CIPFA,.
Jacques, T., 2007. Issue management and crisis management: An integrated, non-linear relational construct. Public Relations Review, 33(2), pp. 147-157.
Jensen, M., 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), p. 831–880.
Jensen, M. & Meckling, W., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), p. 305–360.
Jensen, M. & Murphy, K., 1990. Performance pay and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), p. 225–264.
John, K. & Senbel, 1998. Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(1998), p. 371–403.
Kairiza, T., 2021. US$137m loss sinks run-down AirZim. [Online] Available at: https://www.theindependent.co.zw/2021/05/28/us137m-loss-sinks-run-down-airzim/ [Accessed 12 March 2022].
Kamhungira, T., 2018. Chiri exposes Air Zimbabwe rot. [Online] Available at: https://nehandaradio.com/2018/11/14/chiri-exposes-air-zimbabwe-rot/ [Accessed 11 March 2022].
King-III-Report, 2009. King Report on Governance in Southern Africa. [Online] Available at: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iodsa.co.za/resource/resmgr/king_iii/King_Report_on_Governance_fo.pdf [Accessed 25 February 2022].
Klein, P., Shapiro, D. & Young, J., 2005. Corporate governance, family ownership and firm value: The Canadian evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(5), p. 769–784.
Lewellen, W., Loderer, C. & Martin, K., 1987. Executive compensation and executive incentive problems: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9(3), p. 287–310.
Maani, A., Issa, G., Alghananim, M. & Aljada, R., 2023. THE IMPACT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' CHARACTERISTICS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE ON THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DISCLOSURE IN THE BANKS LISTED ON THE AMMAN STOCK EXCHANGE. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 23 March, 8(4), pp. 1-19.
Mapira, I., 2020. Air Zimbabwe Faces A Four Years Backlog in the Production of Financial Statements. [Online] Available at: http://bhizimusi.com/2020/03/16/airzimbabwe-faces-a-four-years-backlog-inthe-production-of-financial-statements/ [Accessed 12 March 2022].
Mashavave, M., 2017. A Corporate Governance Perspective to State Owned Enterprises in Zimbabwe: A Case Study of Air Zimbabwe. Management, 7(6), pp. 209-222.
Miller, M., 1997. Is American corporate governance fatally flawed?. In: Studies in international corporate finance and governance systems: A comparison of the US, Japan and Europe. s.l.:Oxford University Press.
Mitnick, B., 2015. Agency Theory. Business Ethics, 21 January, Volume 2, pp. 1-15.
Muli, M., 2012. Any Analysis of the Impact of Industry Role Players on the Competitiveness and Profitability of an Airline in a Volatile Environment, UnpublishedThesis, University of South Africa. [Online] Available at: https://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/10192 [Accessed 03 March 2022].
Muli, S., 2012. Any analysis of the impact of industry role players on the competitiveness and profitability of an airline in a volatile environment. s.l.:Unpublished Thesis.
Ndoro, N., 2022. Air Zimbabwe banned from flying in European Union airspace. [Online] Available at: https://nehandaradio.com/2022/04/21/air-zimbabwe-banned-from-flying-in-theeuropean-union-airspace/ [Accessed 22 April 2022].
Porter, M., 1997. Capital choices: Changing the way America invests in industry . In: Studies in international corporate finance and governance systems: A comparison of the US, Japan and Europe. s.l.:Oxford University Press.
Shleifer, A. V., 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), pp. 737-783.
Smith, A., 1776. An enquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. s.l.:Clarendon Press.
SundayMail, 2018. Govt talks tough on AirZim. [Online] Available at: https://www.sundaymail.co.zw/govt-talks-tough-on-air-zim [Accessed 05 March 2022].
Tandoh, I., Duffour, K., Essandoh, M. & Amaoka, R., 2022. Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Top Management Commitment. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(2), pp. 1-27.
WB, 2014. Corporate governance of state-owned enterprises: A toolkit.. [Online] Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/228331468169750340/Corporate-governanceof-state-owned-enterprises-a-toolkit [Accessed 04 March 2022].
Weisbach, M., 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Volume 20, p. 431–460.
Winter, R., 1997. State law, shareholder protection and the theory of the corporation. Journal of Legal Studies, 6(2), p. 251–292.
Yermack, D., 1985. Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively?. Journal of Financial Economics, 39(2-3), p. 237–269.
Zikmund, W. G., 2011. Business research methods. Delhi: Cengage Learning.
Zingales, L., 1998. Corporate governance. In: The new palgrave dictionary of economics and the law. s.l.:Macmillan, p. 497–502.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Daniel Chigudu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html