Improving Firm Sustainability Through Dynamic Capability: The Mediation Role of Ambidexterity




Sustainability, Dynamic Capability, Sensing, Seizing, Reconfiguring, Ambidexterity


Purpose: This study aims to analyze the effect of dynamic capability dimensions on sustainability and ambidexterity. Furthermore, this study also analyzes the mediating role of ambidexterity to influence sensing, seizing and reconfiguring capabilities in building firm sustainability.


Theoretical framework:  There are inconsistencies in previous research related to the effect of dynamic capability. Some recent literatures emphasize the important role of dynamic capability in increasing company sustainability including Li et al. (2019), Dangelico et al. (2017), Chowdhury & Quaddus, (2021). However, in some cases, capability does not have a strong influence on sustainability (Hong et al: 2018, Borahima et al. 2021). This study seeks to analyze further and find a better model.


Design/methodology/approach: This study is a quantitative study with a research population that includes employees, managers, and start-up owners in Yogyakarta. From the population, 250 respondents were taken as research samples. The analysis was carried out using the structural equation model method using AMOS software.


Findings: The results found that sensing capability had no effect on sustainability and ambidexterity. In other side, seizing and reconfiguring capability influence sustainability and ambidexterity. Furthermore, this study found that ambidexterity was not able to mediate sensing capability on sustainability. Meanwhile, ambidexterity has been proven to mediate each effect of seizing and reconfiguring capability on sustainability.


Research, Practical & Social implications: This research emphasizes on managers and entrepreneurs that dynamic capability and ambidexterity have an important role in growing sustainability. Future studies may consider to elaborate further on the role of dynamic capability and ambidexterity both from the aspect of moderating influence and the wider research object aspect.



The results indicate that dynamic capability’s factors especially seizing and reconfiguring capability, also ambidexterity have an important role in company’s sustainability.


Download data is not yet available.


Abdelsalam, O.H., Dimitropoulos, P.E., Elnahass, M., & Leventis, S. (2016). Earnings management behaviors under different monitoring mechanisms: The case of Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 132, 155–173.

Ali, I., Arslan, A., Chowdhury, M., Khan, Z., & Tarba, S. Y. (2022). Reimagining global food value chains through effective resilience to COVID-19 shocks and similar future events: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Business Research, 141, 1-12.

Aslam, H., Khan, A. Q., Rashid, K., & Rehman, S. U. (2020). Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6), 1185-1204.

Bianchi, G., Testa, F., Tessitore, S., & Iraldo, F. (2022). How to embed environmental sustainability: The role of dynamic capabilities and managerial approaches in a life cycle management perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 312-325.

Bieńkowska, A., & Tworek, K. (2020). Job performance model based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC). Sustainability, 12(6), 2250.

Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., & Raisch, S. (2016). How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. California Management Review, 58(4), 36-58.

Borahima, B., Noermijati, N., Hadiwidjojo, D., & Rofiq, A. (2021). Innovation Orientation, Marketing Capability, Dynamic Capability, and Performance. In Environmental, Social, and Governance Perspectives on Economic Development in Asia. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4), 101578.

Ciasullo, M. V., Montera, R., Cucari, N., & Polese, F. (2020). How an international ambidexterity strategy can address the paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Evidence from Chinese emerging market multinationals. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 2110-2129.

Chin, T., Shi, Y., Singh, S. K., Agbanyo, G. K., & Ferraris, A. (2022). Leveraging blockchain technology for green innovation in ecosystem-based business models: A dynamic capability of values appropriation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121908

Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. A. (2021). Supply chain sustainability practices and governance for mitigating sustainability risk and improving market performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123521.

Clampit, J. A., Lorenz, M. P., Gamble, J. E., & Lee, J. (2022). Performance stability among small and medium-sized enterprises during COVID-19: A test of the efficacy of dynamic capabilities. International Small Business Journal, 40(3), 403-419.

Curtis, S. K., & Mont, O. (2020). Sharing economy business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121519.

Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability‐oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506.

Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2016). Adapting to fast-changing markets and technologies. California Management Review, 58(4), 59-77.

Dey, P. K., Malesios, C., De, D., Chowdhury, S., & Abdelaziz, F. B. (2020). The impact of lean management practices and sustainably‐oriented innovation on sustainability performance of small and medium‐sized enterprises: empirical evidence from the UK. British Journal of Management, 31(1), 141-161.

Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 3-18.

Faridian, P. H., & Neubaum, D. O. (2021). Ambidexterity in the age of asset sharing: Development of dynamic capabilities in open-source ecosystems. Technovation, 99, 102125.

Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47-59.

Gomes, P. J., Silva, G. M., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Exploring the relationship between quality ambidexterity and sustainable production. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107560.

Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.

Ho, H., Osiyevskyy, O., Agarwal, J., & Reza, S. (2020). Does ambidexterity in marketing pay off? The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of business research, 110, 65-79.

Hong, J., Zhang, Y., & Ding, M. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of cleaner production, 172, 3508-3519.

Jantunen, A., Tarkiainen, A., Chari, S., & Oghazi, P. (2018). Dynamic capabilities, operational changes, and performance outcomes in the media industry. Journal of Business Research, 89, 251-257.

Josephson, B. W., Johnson, J. L., & Mariadoss, B. J. (2016). Strategic marketing ambidexterity: Antecedents and financial consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 539-554.

Jurksiene, L., & Pundziene, A. (2016). The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. European Business Review.

Kafetzopoulos, D. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, performance and environmental uncertainty. Business Process Management Journal, 27(3), 922-940.

Ketabchi, M. (2020). A descriptive study for the strategic role of human resource flexibility as a full model of organizational ambidexterity in Isfahan Payame Noor University. DYSONA-Life Science, 1(1), 25-35.

Kumar, G., Subramanian, N., & Arputham, R. M. (2018). Missing link between sustainability collaborative strategy and supply chain performance: Role of dynamic capability. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 96-109.

Li, D. Y., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of business research, 67(1), 2793-2799.

Li, L., Li, G., Tsai, F. S., Lee, H. Y., & Lee, C. H. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility on service innovation performance: The role of dynamic capability for sustainability. Sustainability, 11(10), 2739.

Messina, L., Miller, K., Galbraith, B., & Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2022). A recipe for USO success? Unravelling the micro-foundations of dynamic capability building to overcome critical junctures. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121257.

Moreno-Luzon, M. D., Escorcia-Caballero, J. P., & Chams-Anturi, O. (2019). The integration of the supply chain as a dynamic capability for sustainability: The case of an Innovative organic company. In Knowledge, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Organizations (pp. 97-111). Springer, Cham.

Nayal, P., Pandey, N., & Paul, J. (2022). Covid‐19 pandemic and consumer‐employee‐organization wellbeing: A dynamic capability theory approach. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(1), 359-390.

Ojha, D., Acharya, C., & Cooper, D. (2018). Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 215-231.

Oxford Analytica. (2022). Slovakia seems likely to fall into recession in 2023. Emerald Expert Briefings, (oxan-es).

Ozili, P. K., & Arun, T. (2022). Spillover of COVID-19: impact on the Global Economy. In Managing Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions in the Global Economy (pp. 41-61). IGI Global.

Pangarso, A., Astuti, E. S., Raharjo, K., & Afrianty, T. W. (2020). The impact of absorptive capacity and innovation ambidexterity on sustainable competitive advantage: the case of Indonesian higher education. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2436.

Pasamar, S., Lopez–Cabrales, A., & Valle–Cabrales, R. (2015). Ambidexterity and intellectual capital architectures for developing dynamic capabilities: Towards a research agenda. European Journal of International Management, 9(1), 74-87.

Peng, M. Y. P., & Lin, K. H. (2019). Impact of ambidexterity and environmental dynamism on dynamic capability development trade-offs. Sustainability, 11(8), 2334.

Rahman, M., Rasid, S. Z. B. A., & Hussain, S. (2023). The Influence of Audi Fees in the Nexus Between Corporate Sustainability Engagement and Earnings Management. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(3), e01079-e01079.

Rao, I., & Thakur, P. (2019). Knowledge workers, organisational ambidexterity and sustainability: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Business Excellence, 19(3), 415-428.

Raza, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Zhu, N., Hassan, Z., Gul, H., & Hussain, S. (2021). Sustainable supply management practices and sustainability performance: The dynamic capability perspective. Sage Open, 11(1), 21582440211000046.

Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance‐based and variance‐based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.

Relaiza, H.R.S. M.,Nunez, L.A.L., Temple, M.M.S., Miranda, P. S. Y., Bellido, I. E. A. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Control. International Journal of Professional Business Review,8(1), 1- 11. Doi:

Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage.: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic management journal, 35(2), 179-203.

Sijabat, E. A. S., Nimran, U., Utami, H. N., & Prasetya, A. (2021). The Effects of Dynamic Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Creativity and Ambidextrous Innovation on Firm's Competitiveness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 711-721.

Souza, C. P., & Takahashi, A. R. W. (2019). Dynamic capabilities, organizational learning and ambidexterity in a higher education institution. The Learning Organization, 26(4), 397-411.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.;2-Z

Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of international business studies, 45(1), 8-37.

Titin, M. M., Budiyanto, B., & Suhermin, S. (2022). The Effect of Leadership Capability and Collective Commitment With Personal Value Mediation on Cooperative Performance in Lamongan District. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 7(3), 4.

Vijayakumar, V., & Chandrasekar, K. (2022). Moderating Role of Commercial Capabilities on Firm Performance Through Innovative Capability in Manufacturing Msmes. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 7(3), 8.

Wan, X., Cenamor, J., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2017). Unraveling platform strategies: A review from an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Sustainability, 9(5), 734.

Weiss, L., & K Kanbach, D. (2021). Toward an integrated framework of corporate venturing for organizational ambidexterity as a dynamic capability. Management Review Quarterly, 1-42.

Xing, X., Liu, T., Shen, L., & Wang, J. (2020). Linking environmental regulation and financial performance: The mediating role of green dynamic capability and sustainable innovation. Sustainability, 12(3), 1007.

Yuan, B., & Cao, X. (2022). Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. Technology in Society, 68, 101868.

Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Li, D., & Cui, V. (2017). Configurations of innovations across domains: An organizational ambidexterity view. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(6), 821-841.

Zhou, L., Peng, M. Y. P., Shao, L., Yen, H. Y., Lin, K. H., & Anser, M. K. (2021). Ambidexterity in social capital, dynamic capability, and SMEs’ performance: quadratic effect of dynamic capability and moderating role of market orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 584969.




How to Cite

Hadi, P. (2023). Improving Firm Sustainability Through Dynamic Capability: The Mediation Role of Ambidexterity. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), e01511.