A Complementaridade entre Capacidade de Adaptação e Capacidades Dinâmicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2020.v5i1.191Keywords:
Capacidades Dinâmicas, Capacidade de Adaptação, Estratégia Organizacional.Abstract
Objetivo – O objetivo desse estudo é evidenciar que a capacidade de adaptação das organizações depende de capacidades dinâmicas, ou seja, ambas as capacidades são complementares.
Metodologia – A abordagem metodológica adotada foi quantitativa. Como coleta de dados, optou-se pela realização de uma pesquisa survey, cuja uma amostra final foi de 172 respondentes de empresas dos Estados Unidos e da Alemanha. Para testar a hipótese central de que “A capacidade de adaptação da empresa depende do desenvolvimento de capacidades dinâmicas”, utilizou-se como técnica de análise a modelagem de equações estruturais, por meio do método PLS e da ferramenta Smart PLS 3.0. Foi realizada também uma análise multigrupo para verificar eventuais diferenças entre os países estudados.
Originalidade/Relevância – A relevância desta pesquisa consiste em apontar que a capacidade de adaptação depende das capacidades dinâmicas, e que ambas não devem ser confundidas como sinônimos.
Principais resultados – Os resultados permitiram identificar que, tanto para empresas dos Estados Unidos quanto da Alemanha, a capacidade de adaptação se distingue das capacidades dinâmicas, e que as capacidades dinâmicas influenciam na capacidade de adaptação das empresas. Em outras palavras, foi possível constatar que desenvolvimento de capacidades de adaptação de uma organização está associado positivamente ao desenvolvimento de capacidades dinâmicas.
Contribuições – Do ponto de vista teórico, este estudo contribuiu para a visão baseada em capacidades, enquanto do ponto de vista gerencial, recomenda-se que os gestores desenvolvam mais as capacidades dinâmicas em suas organizações para uma adaptabilidade mais eficiente e que permita maior competitividade de longo prazo.
Downloads
References
Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), p. 99-120.
Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280.
Becerra, J. & Reeves, M. (2015). Your Strategy Needs a Strategy. Latin Trade (English), 23(5), 14–16.
Birkinshaw, J. & Gibson, C. (2004). Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45 (4), 47–55.
Carmeli, A., Jones, C.D., & Binyamin, G. (2016). The power of caring and generativity in building strategic adaptability. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 89(1), 46–72.
Carpenter, M.A., Geletkanycz, M.A., & Sanders, W.G. (2004). Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.
Cohen, J. (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press, New York, NY.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: a process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 152-194.
Ganesh, J., Madanmohan, T. R., & Sudhi Seshadri, P.D.J. (2004). Adaptive Strategies of Firms in High-Velocity Environments: The Case of B2B Electronic Marketplaces. Journal of Global Information Management, 12(1), 41–59.
Gibson, C.B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
Hair Jr., J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Hair Jr., J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman, Porto Alegre, RS.
Hambrick, D.C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.
Helfat, C.E. et al. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431.
Hernández Sampieri, R.; Fernández Collado, C,; Baptista Lucio, P. Metodología de la Investigación. 6ª ed. México: McGraw-Hill. 2014.
Kor, Y. Y. et al. Penrose’s The Theory of the Growth of the Firm: An Exemplar of Engaged Scholarship. Production & Operations Management, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 10, p. 1727–1744, 2016.
Kump, B., Engelmann, A., Kessler, A.; Schweiger, C. Toward a dynamic capabilities scale: measuring organizational sensing, seizing, and transforming capacities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2018.
Meirelles, D.S., & Camargo, A.A.B. (2014). Capacidades Dinâmicas: O Que São e Como Identificá-las? RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18, 41–64.
Millar, C.C.J.M., Groth, O., & Mahon, J. F. (2018). Management Innovation in a VUCA World: Challenges and Recommendations. California Management Review, 61(1), 5–14.
Nelson, R. & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Oliveira, A., Saito, L., & Domingues, C. (2020). A Produção Científica Sobre Capacidades Dinâmicas: um Estudo Bibliométrico de 1997 a 2018. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ], 12(2), 223- 241.
Prahalad, C.K. & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.
Priem, R.L. & Butler, J.E. (2001). Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40.
Reeves, M. (2016). The World Just Got More Uncertain and Your Strategy Needs to Adjust. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, p. 2–5, 2016.
Reeves, M. & Deimler, M. (2011). Adaptability: The New Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 89(7/8), 134–141.
Reeves, M., Levin, S., & Ueda, D. (2016). The Biology of Corporate Survival. Harvard Business Review, 94(1), 46–55.
Reeves, M., Love, C., & Tillmanns, P. (2012). Your strategy needs a strategy. Harvard Business Review, 90(9), 76-83.
Ringle, C.M., Silva, D., & Bido, D.S. (2014). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais com Utilização do Smartpls. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(4), 56-73.
Sales Leite, D., & Chagas Jr, M. (2020). Desenvolvimento de um Modelo Dinâmico e Adaptativo comoFerramenta para a Orientação Estratégica em Organizações do Setor Aeroespacial. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ], 12(2), 242-263.
Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum. Disponível em: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf Acesso em: 06 dez. 2019
SEBRAE - Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. (2012). As micro e pequenas empresas na exportação brasileira: 1998-2011. Disponível em: https://m.sebrae.com.br/Sebrae/Portal%20Sebrae/Estudos%20e%20Pesquisas/MPE%20exportacao%202011_Brasil.pdf Acesso em: 09 jul 2019.
Sinha, J., Haanaes, K., & Reeves, M. (2015). Your Strategy Needs a Strategy: How to Choose and Execute the Right Approach. Harvard Business School Cases.
Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Teece, D.J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities & strategic management. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Teece, D.J. (2014). The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Tejeiro Koller, M.R. (2016). Exploring adaptability in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(6), 837–854.
Tuominen, M., Rajala, A., & Möller, K. (2004). How does adaptability drive firm innovativeness? Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 495.
Wang, C.L. & Ahmed, P.K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51.
Winter, S.G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 24(10), 991-995.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html