The Assessment of Company Performance Target Using Balanced Scorecard Methods

Adi Bandono; Sukmo Hadi Nugroho

doi:10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.1968

Authors

Adi Bandono https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1184-1273
Sukmo Hadi Nugroho https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-0173

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.1968

Keywords:

Target Achievement, Company Performance, Balanced Scorecard

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to determine the performance of a company by comparing the targets and company achievements to produce the final score of the balanced scorecard achieved.

Theoretical framework: This study discusses several theoretical frameworks which include Target Achievement, Company Performance and Balanced Scorecard theory along with company key performance indicators

Design/methodology/approach: This research is a descriptive study with quantitative and qualitative approaches using the calculation through the balanced scorecard concept for each key performance indicator in the four balanced scorecard business perspectives by comparing the targets and their achievements to produce the final score of the balanced scorecard achieved by the company.

Findings: The results of this study indicate that (1) The balanced scorecard achievement at Company A in 2020 is 4.15. This value indicates that the target achievement achieved by the company is slightly higher than the predetermined target. (2) Key Performance Indicators (KPI) determined by Company A in 2020 are (a) Financial perspective consisting of Profitability index, Return on Capital Employed, Return on Investment, Current Ratio reaching a cumulative Balanced Scorecard score of 1, 58. (b) Customer Perspective which is carried out by analyzing customer satisfaction which consists of physical evidence, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and care to achieve a BSC cumulative score of 1.00. (c) Internal Business Process Perspective which consists of the innovation ratio and the compliance level ratio reaching the BSC cumulative score of 0.70. (d) Growth and learning perspective consisting of employee satisfaction, the number of employees attending education and training, education and training costs, the implementation time of 0.87.

Research, Practical & Social implications: The results are useful for decision makers in finance companies and other organizations on work culture in Indonesia because they show that the proposed practices have an important impact on organizational excellence.

Originality/value: The value of this study stems from its handling of one of the important sectors, namely the financial industry sector in companies, because this sector is considered the most important and effective in the process of corporate economic development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, & Herdiawan, D. (2019). The application of the CBA and SUG model for improving the quality of Indonesian navy human resources. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C4190.098319

Al-Tamimi, S. A. (2023). Mckinsey Model and Management Accounting Systems Requirements to Measure and Analyze Performance in Sample of Emerging Companies. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e01330-e01330.

Ambarriani, A. S. (2012). The Impact of Manager's Knowledge Towards Manager's Style in Using Management Accounting Information and Activity-Based Management (Study in General Hospitals in Yogyakarta and Central Java). Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 1(1), 356.

Baghel, D., Pawar, P. G., Ingale, P., Ajotikar, M. V., & Sahoo, A. (2023). Effects of creativity and innovation on the entrepreneurial performance of the family business with special reference to banking sector. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e0996-e0996.

Bandono, A. D. I., Suharyo, O. S., & Riono. (2019). Applied fuzzy and NASA tlx methods to measure the mental workload. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 97(2), 476–489.

Chen, S. H., Yang, C. C., & Shiau, J. Y. (2006). The application of a balanced scorecard in the performance evaluation of higher education. The TQM Magazine.

Flayyih, H. H., Mutashar, S. S., & Murad, A. H. (2022). Measuring the Level of Performance of Accounting Units and Their Impact on the Control Environment. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(4), e0680-e0680.

Galib, M., & Hidayat, M. (2018). Analisis Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard Pada PT. Bosowa Propertindo. Seiko: Journal of Management & Business, 2(1), 92-112.

Herdiawan, D., & Ahmadi. (2019). Development strategy of national food sovereignty to encounter radicalism threat. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(11), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.K1570.0881119

Hidayat, M. (2018). Developing the Office of Strategic Management as a Tool to Support the Implementation of Balanced Scorecard in Bosowa Corporation.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Translating strategy introduction the balanced scorecard. Harvard Business School.

Nugroho, S. H., Madhakomala, R., & Gunawan, K. (2019). The system dynamic model for policy evaluation of navy personnel on the state-duty aspect. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 228–236.

Nugroho, S. H., Sukandari, B., Suharyo, O. S., & Bandono, A. (2020). The application of Nasa-Tlx methods to the analysis of Mtf navy personnel allocation. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 6172–6179.

Reza H.K & Nugroho S.H, (2020). The Assessment of Work Performance, Education, and Self Motivation on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 8019 - 8030. Retrieved from http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/8371

Setiadji, A., Marsetio, & Ahmadi. (2019). The assessment of strategic planning and strategic change management to improve organizational performance. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 682–698.

Srimindarti, C. (2004). Balanced scorecard sebagai alternatif untuk mengukur kinerja. Fokus Ekonomi, 3(1), 52-64.

Suharjo, B., Suharyo, O. S., & Bandono, A. (2019). Failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) for determination time interval replacement of critical components in warships radar. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 97(10), 2861–2870. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3256535

Suharjo, B. (2019). Using System Dynamics to Analyze the Leadership Style on Motivation and Soldier’s Performance. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 125). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912522002

Sulistyowati, R., Arifah, A. N., & Kartikasari, E. D. (2019). B. Pengaruh Pengukuran Kinerja dan Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Studi Kasus pada Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Lamongan). Jurnal Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 12-12.

Sumantri, S. H., Bastari, A., & Sri Suharyo, O. (2019). The assessment of naval base sustainability using dynamic system thinking approach. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(11), 388–394.

Susilo, A. K., Putra, I. N., Ahmadi, & Suharyo, O. S. (2020). Analysis of national maritime security strategy as an effect of regional development using SWOT, fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (FMCDM), and Borda. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 25(3), 153–174.

Tunggal, W. A. (2009). Balance Scorecard: Mengukur Kinerja Bisnis. Jakarta: Harvarindo.

Whittaker, J. B. (1995). The Government Performance & Result Act of 1993. ESI Virginia.

Yuwono, S., Sukarno, E., & Ichsan, M. (2002). Petunjuk Praktis Penyusunan Balanced Scorecard: Menuju Organisasi Yang Berfokus Pada Strategi. Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Zainal, V. R., Ramly, H. M., Mutis, T., & Arafah, W. (2019). Manajemen sumber daya manusia untuk perusahaan dari teori ke praktik.