Strategic Policy Model for Management of Plywood Industry Using System Dynamic Methods




Strategic Policy, Plywood Industry, System Dynamic Model


Purpose: This study aims to obtain a strategic model for the arrangement of the Indonesian plywood industry after the monetary crisis with high uncertainty.


Theoretical framework: This study discusses several theoretical frameworks which include Strategic Policy, Plywood Industry, and System Dynamic Modeling.


Design/methodology/approach: This study was conducted covering the stages of collecting data and information, as well as the stages of Dynamic System Modeling.


Findings: The result of the study is the preparation of dynamic systems through formulation into dynamic sub-models, namely: plywood industrial production, sawn timber industry, chip mill industrial production, log raw material production for the wood industry, log economic contribution to the center and the region, illegal export logs, domestic and exports of the wood industry as well as financial feasibility of the plywood industry.


Research, Practical & Social implications: The results of the study are useful for decision makers in Plywood Industry Management on work culture of Indonesia fabricaton because they show that the proposed practices have an important impact on organizational company excellence.


Originality/value: The policies carried out in the plywood industry structuring strategy include a national plywood production limitation policy, a national sawn wood production limitation policy, and a cutting restriction policy in the form of the Annual Allowable Cutting in various combinations which are outlined in eight main policies scenarios and translated into 28 scenarios.


Download data is not yet available.


Astegiano, P., Fermi, F., & Martino, A. (2019). Investigating the impact of e-bikes on modal share and greenhouse emissions: A system dynamic approach. Transportation Research Procedia, 37, 163-170.

Astika, I. M. J., Sukandari, B., Sutrisno, & Suharyo, O. S. (2020). Powder smoke composite building design as a weapon of the sea, air, and land defense sabotage. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 1728–1736.

Austin, J. E. (1992). Agroindustrial project analysis: critical design factors. The World Bank.

Bandono, A. D. I., Suharyo, O. S., & Riono. (2019). Applied fuzzy and NASA TLX methods to measure the mental workload. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 97(2), 476–489.

Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action (No. Q295 C51).

Coyle, G. (2000). Qualitative and quantitative modeling in system dynamics: some research questions. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 16(3), 225-244.

Coyle, G., & Exelby, D. (2000). The validation of commercial system dynamics models. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 16(1), 27-41.

de Almeida, J. M. S., da Costa, P. R., de Castro Pires, A., & Pigola, A. (2022). Relational capability: A Prospective study at Brazilian technological-base enterprises in biotech industry. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(1), e0233-e0233.

Herdiawan, D., & Ahmadi. (2019). Development strategy of national food sovereignty to encounter radicalism threat. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(11), 544–553.

Hitt, M. A., Gimeno, J., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1998). Current and future research methods in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 6-44.

Heru Kreshna Reza, Sukmo Hadi Nugroho. (2020). The Assessment of Work Performance, Education, and Self Motivation on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 8019 - 8030.

Homer, J., & Oliva, R. (2001). Maps and models in system dynamics: a response to Coyle. System dynamics review, 17(4), 347-355.

Kiani, B., & Pourfakhraei, M. A. (2010). A system dynamic model for production and consumption policy in Iran's oil and gas sector. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7764-7774.

Leopold, A. (2016). Energy-related system dynamic models: a literature review. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 24(1), 231-261.

Nikolaou, I., Evangelinos, K., & Leal Filho, W. (2015). A system dynamic approach for exploring the effects of climate change risks on firms' economic performance. Journal of cleaner production, 103, 499-506.

Nugroho, S. H., Madhakomala, R., & Gunawan, K. (2019). Analysis and scenario of navy performance allowance policy using system dynamic model. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 1140–1147.

Nugroho, S. H., Sukandari, B., Bandono, A., & Sri Suharyo, O. (2020). The applications of model bayesian networks for analysis and preventive actions on maritime security operations. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 3000–3006.

Romagnoli, F., Barisa, A., Dzene, I., Blumberga, A., & Blumberga, D. (2014). Implementation of different policy strategies promoting the use of wood fuel in the Latvian district heating system: Impact evaluation through a system dynamic model. Energy, 76, 210-222.

Secretariat, A. S. E. A. N. (2015). ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint 2025, Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

Setiadji, A., Marsetio, & Ahmadi. (2019). The assessment of strategic planning and strategic change management to improve organizational performance. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 682–698.

Sukhawatthanakun, K., Roopsing, T., & Silpcharu, T. (2023). Industrial Procurement Management Efficiency Guidelines: Perform Excellence Through Organisational Change Strategies. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e01770-e01770.




How to Cite

Reza, H. K., Gunawan, K., & Nugroho, S. H. (2023). Strategic Policy Model for Management of Plywood Industry Using System Dynamic Methods. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), e01970.