The Impacts of Internal Audit Practices on the Quality of Internal Control in Vietnamese Smes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.2027Keywords:
COSO, Internal Audit, Internal Control, IPPF, Vietnamese SMEAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the impacts of internal audit practices on internal control in Vietnamese SMEs.
Theoretical framework: This paper employs the three lines of defense model framework to study the impact of internal audit practices on internal control in Vietnamese SMEs. Internal auditing practices were measured by the items listed in the attribute standards and performance standards of the International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF). Internal control quality includes control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring which are provided by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Framework.
Design/methodology/approach: We collect primary data using questionnaire. Data collected from the questionnaire is divided into two groups (1) the measurement of the internal auditing practices and (2) the measurement of the quality of internal control system. We then use the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to test for the hypotheses related to the relationship between internal audit practices and internal control.
Findings: Our results suggest that both attribute standards and performance standards have positive impacts on the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, and monitoring aspects of internal control. Meanwhile, internal audit seems to not influence the information and communication.
Research, Practical & Social implications: The study contributes to the literature by shedding light on the impacts of internal audit practices on the quality of internal control in Vietnamese SMEs.
Originality/value: This study examines the unique context of Vietnamese SMEs. Ultimately, the framework aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how internal audit practices impact internal control quality in this specific context.
Downloads
References
Abbott, L. J., Daugherty, B., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2016). Internal audit quality and financial reporting quality: The joint importance of independence and competence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 3-40.
Chang, Y. T., Chen, H., Cheng, R. K., & Chi, W. (2019). The impact of internal audit attributes on the effectiveness of internal control over operations and compliance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 15(1), 1-19.
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control-integrated framework.
Davies, M. (2001). The changing face of internal audit in local government. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 1(1), 77-98.
Doty, D. H., & Astakhova, M. (2020). Common method variance in international business research: A commentary. Research methods in international business, 399-408.
Ege, M. S. (2015). Does internal audit function quality deter management misconduct?. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 495-527.
Fadzil, F. H., Haron, H., & Jantan, M. (2005). Internal auditing practices and internal control system. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hanim Fadzil, F., Haron, H., & Jantan, M. (2005). Internal auditing practices and internal control system. Managerial auditing journal, 20(8), 844-866.
Kumar, B. (2012). Theory of planned behaviour approach to understand the purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products. Indian institute of management, Ahmedabad India, 1-42.
Malhotra, N., Nunan, D., & Birks, D. (2017). Marketing research: An applied approach. Pearson.
Sawyer, L. B., & Vinten, G. (1996). The manager and the internal auditor: Partners for profit. Wiley.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dung Ngo Tien, Hanh Hoang Thanh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html