Comparison of Satisfaction Levels Between Post-Operative Sectio Caesaria Patients Followed by the Eracs Protocol TAP Block Analgesia Method and IV Patient Controlled Analgesia: A Literature Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i10.3384

Keywords:

Sectio Caesarea, ERACS, Patient Satisfaction, TAP Block Analgesia Method, IV Patient Controlled Analgesia

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to examine the results of the past ten years of research related to the satisfaction levels of postoperative sectio cesarea patients followed by the ERACS protocol TAP block analgesia method and IV patient-controlled analgesia.

 

Theoretical framework: Cesarean section is one of the most common methods of delivery in the world. The enhancement of public interest in the cesarean section has also increased perioperative services. In order to increase the clinical benefits of cesarean section, enhanced recovery care is an effective way to do it. ERACS (Enhanced Recovery After Caesarian Surgery) is a fast recovery program after a cesarean section in the form of a series of treatments to improve post-surgical recovery. These conditions make expectations related to patient comfort and satisfaction during treatment.

 

Design/Methodology/Approach: The method used in the preparation of a literature review is to search for several articles by searching through science direct, google scholar, and Pubmed.

 

Findings: The results of 20 previous research articles showed that Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cesarean section showed the results that standardizing postoperative patient care, improving patient outcomes, reducing the postoperative length of stay, and optimizing patient satisfaction.

 

Research, Practical & Social implications: In postoperative management of the ERAS method, there are various methods, including regional block analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia. TAP block and PCA effectively relieve postoperative pain after cesarean section.

 

Originality/Value: This paper shows a large number of alternatives and the choice of post-cesarean section analgesic methods and drugs with the ERACS protocol means that pharmacology and anesthesia must be accompanied by aspects of patient satisfaction surveys which play a role in selecting the most effective drug or analgesic method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdallah, F. W. et al. (2013) ‘Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: A meta-analysis’, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 111(5), pp. 721–735. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet214.

Adeel, S., Narayan, P., Mahesh, CM., Abuhassan, K., Elsemeen, R., Skowronski, S. (2017) ‘Ultrasound‑Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block- An Evaluation of its efficacy in reducing post-operative opioid requirements in caerean section.pdf’, Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 7(81), p. 4. doi: 10.4103/joacc.JOACC_46_16.

Aini, Q. (2020) ‘Model of patient safety behavior influenced by culture and attitudes of safety patients: Case study of PKU Muhammadiyah Hospital in Bantul’, Enfermeria Clinica, 30, pp. 272–275. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.06.062.

Ali, S., Athar, M. and Ahmed, S. M. (2019) ‘Basics of CPB’, Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 49(4), pp. 257–262. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA.

Ciechanowicz, S. et al. (2023) ‘Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review’, AJOG Global Reports, 3(1), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100152.

Dereu, D. et al. (2019) ‘The impact of a transversus abdominis plane block including clonidine vs. intrathecal morphine on nausea and vomiting after caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial’, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 36(8), pp. 575–582. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001013.

Ebneshahidi, A., Akbari, M., & Heshmati, B. (2012). Patient-controlled versus nurse-controlled post-operative analgesia after caesarean section. Advanced Biomedical Research, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.94428

Elnasr, N. A. and Elghazaly, M. M. (2015) ‘Ultrasound-Guided Transverses Abdominis Plane Block Versus Patients Controlled Analgesia As a New Trending Pain-Free …’, … Assiut Medical Journal, 13(2), pp. 324–334. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nour-El-Hoda-Nasr/publication/357340562_ULTRASOUND-GUIDED_TRANSVERSES_ABDOMINIS_PLANE_BLOCK_VERSUS_PATIENTS_CONTROLLED_ANALGESIA_AS_A_NEW_TRENDING_PAIN-FREE_CESAREAN_DELIVERY/links/61c985f4b8305f7c4b049d9f/ULTRASOUND-G.

Erbabacan, E. et al. (2015) ‘Alt batın cerrahisi Sonrası transversus abdominis plan blok ile IV hasta Kontrollü analjezi uygulamasının Karşılaştırılması’, Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dernegi Dergisi, 43(1), pp. 24–28. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.82788.

Fusco, P. et al. (2015) ‘Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after cesarean delivery. A systematic review’, Minerva Anestesiologica, 81(2), pp. 195–204.

Gao, Y. et al. (2019) ‘Clinical study of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after cesarean section’, Medicine (United States), 98(41). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017542.

Geng, Z. Y. et al. (2023) ‘Addition of preoperative transversus abdominis plane block to multimodal analgesia in open gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial’, BMC anesthesiology, 23(1), p. 21. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-01981-w.

Khoo, C. K., Vickery, C. J., Forsyth, N., Vinall, N. S., & Eyre-Brook, I. A. (2007). A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Multimodal Perioperative Management Protocol in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resection for Cancer. Annals of Surgery, 245(6), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000259219.08209.36

Jabid, A. W., Soleman, M. M., & Jannang, A. R. (2023). The Mediating Role of Islamic Job Satisfaction on Relationship of Islamic Work Ethics on Intention to Leave. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(6), e02066. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.2066

Kupiec, A. et al. (2018) ‘The analgesic efficiency of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after caesarean delivery’, Ginekologia Polska, 89(8), pp. 421–424. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0072.

Kurniawaty, S. R. F. (2020). Pengaruh Teknik Relaksasi Genggam Jari Terhadap Intensitas Nyeri Pada Ibu Post Sectio Caesarea Kurniawaty 1 , Salna Reni Febrianita 2 Prodi DIII Keperawatan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan ‘Aisyiyah Palembang 1,2. 5, 132–142.

Laronche, A., Popescu, L. and Benhamou, D. (2017) ‘An enhanced recovery programme after caesarean delivery increases maternal satisfaction and improves maternal-neonatal bonding: A case control study’, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 210, pp. 212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.034.

Motamed, C. (2022). Clinical Update on Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Acute Postoperative Pain. Pharmacy: Journal of Pharmacy Education and Practice, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACY10010022

O’Carroll, J., Carvalho, B. and Sultan, P. (2022) ‘Enhancing recovery after cesarean delivery – A narrative review’, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology, 36(1), pp. 89–105. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.01.001.

Oxom & Forte. (2010). Ilmu Kebidanan Patologi dan Fisiologi Persalinan. CV. Andi Offset.

Pan, J. et al. (2020) ‘The advantage of implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in acute pain management during elective cesarean delivery: A prospective randomized controlled trial’, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 16, pp. 369–378. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S244039.

Patel, K., & Zakowski, M. (2021). Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean: Current and Emerging Trends. Current Anesthesiology Reports, 11(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00442-9

Roofthooft, E. et al. (2021) ‘PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations’, Anaesthesia, 76(5), pp. 665–680. doi: 10.1111/anae.15339.

Salem, S. M. et al. (2021) ‘The new trending pain-free cesarean section: TAP block versus IV PCA’, Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 45(1). doi: 10.1186/s42269-021-00588-w.

Staker, J. J. et al. (2018) ‘A triple-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial of the ilioinguinal-transversus abdominis plane (I-TAP) nerve block for elective caesarean section’, Anaesthesia, 73(5), pp. 594–602. doi: 10.1111/anae.14222.

Sjarifudhin, M. and Maria Rosa, E. (2018) ‘Effectiveness of Patient Centered Care to Reduce Anxiety Level and Improve Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery’, Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit, 7(3). doi: 10.18196/jmmr.7372.

Suhartono, S., Sulastiningsih, S., Chasanah, U., Widiastuti, N., & Purwanto, W. (2023). The Relationship of Leadership, Discipline, Satisfaction, and Performance: A Case Study of Steel Manufacture in Indonesia. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2), e01146. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i2.1146

Sultan, P. et al. (2020) ‘Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery versus standard care studies: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes’, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 43, pp. 72–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.03.003.

Teigen, N. C. et al. (2020) ‘Enhanced recovery after surgery at cesarean delivery to reduce postoperative length of stay: a randomized controlled trial’, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 222(4), pp. 372.e1-372.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.009.

Xue, M. et al. (2022) ‘Analgesia Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Double-Blind Controlled Trial’, Pain and Therapy, 11(4), pp. 1287–1298. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00425-6.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-09

How to Cite

Raharja, S., & Aini, Q. (2023). Comparison of Satisfaction Levels Between Post-Operative Sectio Caesaria Patients Followed by the Eracs Protocol TAP Block Analgesia Method and IV Patient Controlled Analgesia: A Literature Review. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(10), e03384. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i10.3384