The Influence of Leadership Commitment, Human Capital and Work Culture on Bureaucratic Performance Through Good Governance of Local Governments in South Sulawesi Province

Jemi Pabisangan Tahirs; Siti Haerani; Fauziah Umar

doi:10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i9.3443

Authors

Jemi Pabisangan Tahirs Universitas Malikussaleh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5345-2903
Siti Haerani https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-2852
Fauziah Umar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7889-7514

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i9.3443

Keywords:

Leadership Commitment, Human Capital, Work Culture, Bureaucracy, Good Governance, South Sulawesi Regional Govern-ment

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of leadership commitment, human capital, and work culture on bureaucratic performance through good governance in local governments in the province of South Sulawesi.

Theoretical framework: Local governments face challenges in achieving effective performance and good governance. Factors such as leadership commitment, human capital, and work culture influence organizational effectiveness. Leadership commitment involves dedicated and accountable leaders, while human capital encompasses knowledge and skills. Work culture refers to shared values and behaviors. Good governance ensures transparency and accountability. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving local government performance and meeting public expectations.

Design/methodology/approach: The research method used is survey research, with questionnaires as the data collection instrument. Statistical analysis using the AMOS program is employed for data analysis.

Findings: The findings reveal the following: 1) Leadership commitment, human capital, and work culture have a positive and significant effect on good governance in local governments in South Sulawesi Province; 2) Leadership commitment, human capital, and work culture have a positive and significant influence on bureaucratic performance in local governments in South Sulawesi Province; 3) Good governance has a positive and significant influence on bureaucratic performance in local governments in South Sulawesi Province; 4) Leadership commitment, human capital, and work culture have a positive and significant effect on bureaucratic performance through good governance in local governments in South Sulawesi Province.

Research, Practical & Social implications: Implementing good governance principles can lead to more accountable and responsive local government organizations, enhancing public trust and satisfaction with government services. These insights have practical implications for policymakers and administrators seeking to enhance organizational effectiveness and serve their communities better.

Originality/value: The originality value of this study lies in its specific focus on the province of South Sulawesi and its examination of the influence of leadership commitment, human capital, and work culture on bureaucratic performance through good governance in the context of local governments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andreski, S. (2013). Max Weber on capitalism, bureaucracy and religion (Vol. 4). Routledge.

Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.

Arthur, M. B., Hall, D. T., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Generating new directions in career theory: The case for a transdisciplinary approach. Handbook of Career Theory, 7, 25.

Atreya, B., & Armstrong, A. (2002). A review of the criticisms and the future of new public management. Victoria University. https://vuir.vu.edu.au/169/1/wp7_2002_atreya_armstrong.pdf

Blau, P., & Meyer, M. W. (1994). Why study bureaucracy. Current Issues in Public Administration, 5–16.

Budi, A. P., & Wirakusuma, M. G. (2015). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Organisasi dengan penerapan good governance sebagai variabel moderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. ISSN, 2302–8556.

Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286.

Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.

Edelia, A., & Aslami, N. (2022). The Role of Empowerment of The Cooperative and MSME Office in The Development of Small and Medium Micro Enterprises in Medan City. MARGINAL : Journal Of Management, Accounting, General Finance And International Economic Issues, 1(3), 31–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/marginal.v1i3.163

Idrus, M. A. M. B. M., Amiruddin, S. A. B., Jamaludin, S. A. B. J., & Hamid, S. E. B. A. (2018). Development of a Batik Fiberglass Composite for Marine Applications Based on Water Absorption Testing. Engineering Applications for New Materials and Technologies, 57–66.

Islamy, M. I. (1998). Agenda Kebijakan Reformasi Administrasi Negara. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Dalam Ilmu Kebijakan Publik, FIA Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.

Kaloh, J. (2003). Kekuasaan, dan Perilaku Kepala daerah Dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kettl, D. F. (2015). The job of government: Interweaving public functions and private hands. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 219–229.

Koch, M. J., & McGrath, R. G. (1996). Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic Management Journal, 17(5), 335–354.

Lubis, H., & Erman, E. (2017). Penyediaan Pelayanan Publik Dalam Persoalan Sampah Di Kota Pekanbaru Tahun 2014-2016. Riau University.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Understanding organizational culture: A key leadership asset. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 29(4), 1–12.

Mahmudi, M. (2003). New Public Management (NPM): Pendekatan Baru Manajemen Sektor Publik. Sinergi: Kajian Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 6(1).

Mahsyar, A. (2011). Masalah pelayanan publik di Indonesia dalam perspektif administrasi publik. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(2).

Mangkunegara, A. P. (2006). Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Cetakan Kedua. PT Refika Aditama.

Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.

Nugroho, R. (2013). Kebijakan Publik: Formulasi, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi. PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Prasojo, E., & Kurniawan, T. (2008). Bureaucratic Reform and Good Governance: Cases of Best Practices from a Number of Regions in Indonesia. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 7, 1–9.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior 17th Global Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Romer, P. M. (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. The American Economic Review, 77(2), 56–62.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd Editio). John Wiley & Sons.

Siagian, S. P. (1994). Patologi birokrasi: Analisis, identifikasi dan terapinya. Ghalia Indonesia.

Sipayung, B., W.A., D., & Purwoyo, P. (2022). Teori Organisasi Cerdas dan Perbandingannya dengan Teori Birokrasi Menurut Max Weber. Literatus : Literature for Social Impact and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v4i1.676

Skinner, B. F. (2014). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis (Vol. 3). BF Skinner Foundation.

Titisari, P. (2012). Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB): Variabel Anteseden dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara (KPPN) Wilayah Jawa Timur. Universitas Brawijaya.

Triguno, D. (2004). Budaya Kerja Menciptakan Lingkungan Yang Kondusive untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas Kerja. Jakarta, Golden Trayon Press.

Weatherly, L. A. (2003). Human capital—the elusive asset measuring and managing human capital: A strategic imperative for HR. Research Quarterly, 13(1), 82–86.