A Bibliometric Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Performance: Current Status, Development and Future Trends
Keywords:Corporate Sustainability Performance, Corporate Social Sustainability, Corporate Environmental Sustainability, Corporate Economic Sustainability, Bibliometric
Purpose: This study aimed to focus on bibliometric analysis and the concept of corporate sustainability performance (CSP) to understand the evolutionary and developmental trends in the field of CSP.
Design/methodology/approach: This study conducted a bibliometric analysis of 1,518 Scopus-indexed documents on CSP published from 1975 to August 2021 to provide meaningful insights for further discussions. For this purpose, the study used VOSviewer software for drafting the literature and Harzing's Publish or Perish software to obtain impact matrices and citation information.
Findings: The findings revealed that the number of CSP-related publications has increased in recent years (1975-1991: 21 publications, 1992-2007: 206 publications, and 2008-2021: 1291 publications). Furthermore, the findings revealed a significant increase in interest in the CSP field. Business, management, and accounting (34 %) were the most studied subject areas, and the Journal of Business Ethics, with a TP of 150, as the most productive scientific journal.
Research, Practical & Social implications: This study examines how academic interest in CSP has evolved and identifies areas for further exploration in the CSP context. This study contributes to the current literature in the CSP domain by providing a bibliometric analysis. Furthermore, this bibliometric analysis would aid in decision-making and policy formulation related to CSP.
Originality/value: The overall findings revealed an increase in CSP development in the scientific field, linked to the continued expansion of empirical research papers, researchers/authors, and citations.
Anser, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Kanwal, L. (2018). Moderating effect of innovation on corporate social responsibility and firm performance in realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 799-806. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1495
Awan, U., Khattak, A., & Kraslawski, A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) priorities in the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the industrial sector of Sialkot, Pakistan. In Corporate social responsibility in the manufacturing and services sectors (pp. 267-278). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33851-9_15
Belmonte-Urena, L. J., Garrido-Cardenas, J. A., & Camacho-Ferre, F. (2020). Analysis of world research on grafting in horticultural plants. HortScience, 55(1), 112-120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14533-19
Block, J. H., & Fisch, C. (2020). Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research. Management Review Quarterly, 3(70), 307–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00177-2
Bostrom, M. (2012). The problematic social dimension of sustainable development: the case of the Forest Stewardship Council. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(1), 3-15.
Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., Brown, C., & Watkins, D. (2009). Social sustainability and urban form: evidence from five British cities. Environment and Planning A, 41(9), 2125-2142.
Colantonio, A. (2009). Social sustainability: a review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods Second International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment: conference proceedings. , UK,.
Council, E. (2006). Time to move up a gear: the new partnership for growth and jobs. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Cretan, R., & Obrien, T. (2020). Corruption and conflagration:(in) justice and protest in Bucharest after the Colectiv fire. Urban Geography, 41(3), 368-388.
Domenech, T., Bleischwitz, R., Doranova, A., Panayotopoulos, D., & Roman, L. (2019). Mapping Industrial Symbiosis Development in Europe_ typologies of networks, characteristics, performance and contribution to the Circular Economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 76-98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.016
Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149-159.
Gomez, A. M. M., Gonzalez, F. A., & Barcena, M. M. (2018). Smart eco-industrial parks: A circular economy implementation based on industrial metabolism. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 58-69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.007
Hamada, H. M., Thomas, B. S., Tayeh, B., Yahaya, F. M., Muthusamy, K., & Yang, J. (2020). Use of oil palm shell as an aggregate in cement concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 265, 120357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120357
Hasana, U., Swain, S., & George, B. (2022). Community Centered Management of Ecological Resources for Sustainable Tourism: Benefits and Costs. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(1), 01-31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i1.269
Hunkeler, D. (2006). Societal LCA methodology and case study (12 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(6), 371-382.
Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1688-1698.
Ikram, M., Zhou, P., Shah, S., & Liu, G. (2019). Do environmental management systems help improve corporate sustainable development?. Evidence from manufacturing companies in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 628-641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.265
Khudzari, J. M., Kurian, J., Tartakovsky, B., & Raghavan, G. V. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microbial fuel cells using Scopus database. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 136, 51-60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.05.002
Kitsios, F., Kamariotou, M., & Talias, M. A. (2020). Corporate sustainability strategies and decision support methods: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12(2), 521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020521
Kuzma, E., & Sehnem, S. (2021). Validation of the Measurement Scale for the Circular Economy: A proposal based on the precepts of innovation. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(1), 01-20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i1.278
Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & Van Erck, R. P. (2005). Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(4), 373-385.
Landorf, C. (2011). Evaluating social sustainability in historic urban environments. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17(5), 463-477.
Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1075-1082.
Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R. W. (2007). Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Accounting Forum, 31(3), 233-253.
McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards Some Definitions. Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series, 27, 1-31.
Meseguer-Sanchez, V., Galvez-Sanchez, F. J., Lopez-Martinez, G., & Molina-Moreno, V. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability. A Bibliometric Analysis of Their Interrelations. Sustainability, 13(4), 1636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041636
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
Nicolaescu, E., Alpopi, C., & Zaharia, C. (2015). Measuring corporate sustainability performance. Sustainability, 7(1), 851-865. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010851
Nunez-Cacho, P., Gorecki, J., Molina, V., & Corpas-Iglesias, F. (2020). How to measure and predict degree of circularity thinking in construction sector?. Modern way to build competitive advantage. VISION, 3907-3920.
Parast, M. M., & Adams, S. G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility, benchmarking, and organizational performance in the petroleum industry: A quality management perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2), 447-458.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value. In Managing sustainable business (pp. 323-346). Springer.
Portney, P. R. (2020). The not so new corporate social responsibility: An empirical perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren003
Reyes Menendez, A., Saura, J. R., & Alvarez Alonso, C. (2018). Understanding# WorldEnvironmentDay user opinions in Twitter: A topic-based sentiment analysis approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(11), 25-37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112537
Robert, K. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development?. Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8-21.
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance?.
The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341-350.
Savitz, A., & Weber, W. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best-run companies are achieving economic. (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Schwartz, S. J., Montgomery, M. J., & Briones, E. (2006). The role of identity in acculturation among immigrant people: Theoretical propositions, empirical questions, and applied recommendations. Human Development, 49(1), 1-30.
Tanzil, D., & Beloff, B. R. (2006). Assessing impacts: Overview on sustainability indicators and metrics. Environmental Quality Management, 15(4), 41-56.
Tseng, M.-L., Islam, M. S., Karia, N., Fauzi, F. A., & Afrin, S. (2019). A literature review on green supply chain management: Trends and future challenges. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 145-162.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.Downloaded:2020.04.08 (2015)
Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553-1560.
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Thematic issue on corporate social responsibility corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534.
WCED. (1987). Report of the World commission on environment and development: our common future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.Downloaded:2020.04.08
Zheng, C., & Kouwenberg, R. (2019). A bibliometric review of global research on corporate governance and board attributes. Sustainability, 11(12), 3428.
Zhu, Q., Zou, F., & Zhang, P. (2019). The role of innovation for performance improvement through corporate social responsibility practices among small and medium‐sized suppliers in C hina. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 341-350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1686
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Fahmi Sheikh Hassan, Syeda Saba Nazir Gardazi, Mohammed Sabo Bello
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html