Strategy to Improve KPM’s Start-Up Business Creativity in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship Program

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.590

Keywords:

Creativity, KPM, Social Entrepreneurship, Start-up, Sustainable

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this research was to investigate strategy to improve KPM’s start-up business creativity in the context of social entrepreneurship program.

 

Theoretical framework: The primary goal of social work is to improve a society's overall well-being, especially for the most vulnerable populations. It's not just corporate responsibility where social workers can help businesses and strengthen entrepreneurship (Zastrow, 2017).

 

Design/methodology/approach: The method used a qualitative approach by interviewing 3 informants of KPM, and the data was analysed by using SWOT analysis to helping identify competitive opportunities for improvement. It was designed to assess strengths (S) and weaknesses (W) as internal capabilities, while opportunities (O) and threats (T) are posed by the external environment.

 

Findings: KPM was in incubate profile of creativity and need to empower their business skill to be sustainable, and needed the intervention of social work in giving some business education and to strengthen social entrepreneurship of KPM by using case work method should be improved.

 

Research, Practical & Social implications:  This research is urgently needed to break KPM's dependence on public assistance and increase their sustainable income through business startups and strengthen their entrepreneurial spirit.

 

Originality/value:  This research related to social work intervention in business and industry to strengthen KPM start-up through social entrepreneurship. KPM showed that they still rely on public assistance to meet their daily needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen rubin, earl babbie 1989. Research Methods for Social Work. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Amin, S & Jaya, I. 2019. Creativity and innovation in achieving success in traditional cake businesses. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah, 6(4):435–444.

Barnir, A. & Smith, K. 2002. Interfirm Alliances in the Small Business: The Role of Social Networks. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3): 219–32.

Creswell & John, W. 1994. Research Design, Qualitiative and Quantitative Approaches. California: Sage Publication.

DeGraff & Lawrence, 2002. Creativity at Work. San Francisco: A Wiley Company.

Dennis, C. 2000. Networking for Marketing Advantage. Management Decision, 38(4):287–292.

Dietrich, A. 2004. The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6):1011-1026.

Dulce, G. & Magnus, B. & Richard, B. & Sverker, A. 2020. Cultural Aspects of Organizational Agility Affecting Digital Innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 16(4):13-46.

Fazlagić, J. & Sulczewska-Remi, A. & Loopesko, W. 2021. City Policies to Promote Entrepreneurship: A Cross-Country Comparison of Poland and Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(2):159-185.

Hasenfeld, Y. 2010. The Attributes of Human Service Organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.). Human Service as Complex Organization. CA: Sage Publication.

Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. 1982. Management of Organizational Behaviour. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Indriartiningtias, R. & Subagyo & Hartono, B. 2019. Creativity of small firms in creative industry: Initial evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 11(3):1-13.

Kettner, PM. & Moroney, RM. & Martin, LL. 2015. Designing and managing programs: An effectiveness-based approach. London: Sage Publication.

Kirkwood, JD. 2019. An assessment of volunteer longevity in the naational park service volunteers-in-parks program: a case study. Minneapolis: Capella University.

Kovanen, S. 2021. Social entrepreneurship as a collaborative practice: Literature review and research agenda. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(1): 97-128.

Lehman & Peter & Coady, N. 2008. Theoretical Perspective for Direct Social Work Practice, A Generalist-Eclectic Approach. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Mmaphuti Percy Dipela, Boitumelo Joyce Mohapi. 2021. Barriers Affecting Effective Monitoring and Evaluation of Poverty Alleviation Projects Within Waterberg District. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 57(3):287-301.

Miles, B. & Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publication.

Moelyono, S.E., M.A. 2010. Menggerakkan Ekonomi Kreatif, Antara Tuntutan dan Kebutuhan. Jakarta: P.T. Rajafgrafindo Persada.

Mishna, F. & Milne, E. & Bogo, M. & Pereira, Lf. 2020. Responding to COVID-19: New trends in social workers use of information and communication Technology. Clin Soc Work J, 49(4):484-494.

Janita Dewi, Ginta Ginting (2022) 2022.1leadership and entrepreneurship for creativity and survival of tourism villages in the covid-19 times: the moderating role of external support international journal of professional business review, vol.7(5)01-22, https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i5.e940

Muhammad, M. 2020. Social Entrepreneurship Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Berdasarkan Prinsip-Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah. El-Iqtishady. 2(2):68-78.

Neuman, Lawrence W. 1991. Social Research Method, Qualitative and Quantitative Approahes. New York: Allyn & Bacon A Viacom Company.

Ornellas, A. Lambert, O. & Elvan, A. 2020. The fourfold neoliberal impact on social work and why this matters in times of the Covid-19 pandemic and beyond. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 56 (3):402–416.

Raniga, T. 2018. Poverty alleviation, social protection policy and sustainability of economic development cooperatives: Voices of women residing in Bhambayi, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 54(4):395–406.

Raniga, T. & Matsai, V. 2021. Economic stressors and coping strategies of single mothers living in poverty in Zimbabwe. Social Work / Maatskaplike Werk, 57(1):182–192.

Raquel M & Ricardo C & Jose C. 2014. The Impact of Succession on Family Business Internationalisation. The Successors’ Perspective. Journal of Family Business Management, 4(1):24-45.

Republic Indonesia. 2009. Ministry of Social Affairs. Law Number 11 concerning Social Welfare. Government Gazette

Republic Indonesia. 2021. Regulation of The Ministry of Social Affairs. Implementasi Program Sembako. Government Gazette.

Rubin A, Babbie Er. 2016. Empowerment series: Research methods for social work. USA: Cengage Learning.

Nia Hoerniasih, Achmad Hufad, Uyu Wahyudin, Elih Sudiapermana, Dadang Yunus, Cucu Sukmana 2022." PENTAHELIX BASED ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AT PKBMASHOLAHIYAH" , Intern. Journal of Profess. Bus. Review.,vol.7(3)p. 01-15 , https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i3.e616

Saldaña, J. 2021. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Research. Sage Publication.

Sfeatcu, R. ET AL. 2014. The concept of wellbeing in relation to health and quality of life. European Journal of Science and Theology, 10(4):123–128.

Soegiastuti, J. & Muchayatin. 2020.The Effect of Entrepreneurial Creativity and Innovation Determination on SME Entrepreneurship Performance in Semarang. International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 7(7):18-22.

Stogdill, R (ed). 1974. Handbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press.

Straussner, Shulamith Lala Ashenberg (ed.). 1990. Occupational Social Work Today. Binghamton: The Haworth Press

Suharsono, N. 2018. Pendidikan Kewirausahaan dari Teori ke Aplikasi Model Patriot Sejati. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.Suharto, E. 2007. Pekerjaan Sosial di Dunia Industri (Memperkuat Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility). Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Thompson, L. 2006. Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Zastrow, C. 2017. Introduction to Social Work. USA: Cengage Learning.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-29

How to Cite

Sariningsih, Y., Albert, W. K. G., & Mariane, I. (2023). Strategy to Improve KPM’s Start-Up Business Creativity in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship Program. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e0590. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.590