Reviewing the Framework of Risk Management: Policy and Hedging
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i1.928Keywords:
Risk Management, Organisational Policies, Hedging, Change Management, Financial HedgingAbstract
Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to evaluate different policies for managing the business risks in an effective manner.
Theoretical framework: In order to identify the hazards within the organization and evaluate several risk factors, risk management is necessary. This is a method of “analysing and evaluating” the risks, which are associated with the hazard. After making identification the risks need to analyse properly. Evaluation of the risks is based on the position and activities of the firms. Hazard identification is a process of finding out the hazards, then making a list of those hazards and after that characterizing.
Design/methodology/approach: The deductive approach is the best approach to understand the structure of the study. The deductive approach focuses on the evaluation of different theoretical views for finding out the pattern related to the generic views of a particular research topic.
Findings: It is identified that the risk management is one of the major parts of business companies, which creating specific policies. The usage of hedging can lead to an effective risk management process.
Research, Practical & Social implications: Businesses can benefit more from a strong foundation for managing risks. Risk assessment is applicable to all industries and is not just related to businesses or companies.
Originality/value: This study is different from the previous studies because it examined the risk management framework (policy and hedging) in detailed way.
Downloads
References
Andrade, C., 2018. Internal, external, and ecological validity in research design, conduct, and evaluation. Indian journal of psychological medicine, 40(5), pp.498-499.
Bendel, B., Schwenk, J., Madsen, T. and Fekete, M., 2021. Applying DEFCON and the Homeland Security Advisory System in organisational risk management. SCENTIA International Economic Review, 1(1), pp.192-202.
Buehler, H., Gonon, L., Teichmann, J. and Wood, B., 2019. Deep hedging. Quantitative Finance, 19(8), pp.1271-1291.
Draper, J., Young Thomas, L. and Fenich, G.G., 2018, January. Event management research over the past 12 years: What are the current trends in research methods, data collection, data analysis procedures, and event types? Journal of Convention & Event Tourism (Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 3-24). Routledge.
George, D. and Mallery, P., 2018. Descriptive statistics. In IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step (pp. 126-134). Routledge.
Khosravi-Farmad, M. and Ghaemi-Bafghi, A., 2020. Bayesian decision network-based security risk management framework. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 28(4), pp.1794-1819.
Kočenda, E. and Moravcová, M., 2019. Exchange rate movements, hedging and volatility spillovers on new EU forex markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 58, pp.42-64.
Lechowska, E., 2021. Approaches in research on flood risk perception and their importance in flood risk management: a review. Natural Hazards, pp.1-36.
Liu, Z. and Wang, J., 2019. Supply chain network equilibrium with strategic financial hedging using futures. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(3), pp.962-978.
Maarouf, H., 2019. Pragmatism as a supportive paradigm for the mixed research approach: Conceptualizing the ontological, epistemological, and axiological stances of pragmatism. International Business Research, 12(9), pp.1-12.
Masuin, R., Latief, Y. and Zagloel, T.Y., 2020. Development of integration risk on integrated management system in order to increase organisational performance of construction company. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 12(2), pp.164-177.
migso-pcubed, 2021 The risk management process [Online] Available at: https://www.migso-pcubed.com/blog/pmo-project-delivery/four-step-risk-management-process/ [Accessed on 15th April]
Moon, K., Blackman, D.A., Adams, V.M., Colvin, R.M., Davila, F., Evans, M.C., Januchowski‐Hartley, S.R., Bennett, N.J., Dickinson, H., Sandbrook, C. and Sherren, K., 2019. Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology, and methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(3), pp.294-302.
Morgan, G.A., Barrett, K.C., Leech, N.L. and Gloeckner, G.W., 2019. IBM SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation: Use and Interpretation. Routledge.
Salamai, A., Hussain, O.K., Saberi, M., Chang, E. and Hussain, F.K., 2019. Highlighting the importance of considering the impacts of both external and internal risk factors on operational parameters to improve Supply Chain Risk Management. IEEE Access, 7, pp.49297-49315.
Samimi, A., 2020. Risk Management in Information Technology. Progress in Chemical and Biochemical Research, 3(2), pp.130-134.
Ullah, F., Qayyum, S., Thaheem, M.J., Al-Turjman, F. and Sepasgozar, S.M., 2021. Risk management in sustainable smart cities governance: A TOE framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, p.120743.
Venter, C., 2020, June. A Reflection on SSM to Improve Organisational Risk-Based Project Governance and Decision Support Mechanisms. In ECRM 2020 20th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies: ECRM 2020 (p. 300). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
Xia, N., Zou, P.X., Griffin, M.A., Wang, X. and Zhong, R., 2018. Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: A systematic literature review and future research agendas. International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), pp.701-715.
Zhen, X., Vinnem, J.E., Yang, X. and Huang, Y., 2020. Quantitative risk modelling in the offshore petroleum industry: integration of human and organizational factors. Ships and Offshore Structures, 15(1), pp.1-18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mamoun Shakatreh, Mohammed A. Abu Rumman, Mohamed Ibrahim Mugableh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html